Saturday, June 30, 2007

105 yr old Cuban Ceases to be Cuban as he Becomes an American.


Yahoo News is reporting that an 105 yr old man that was exiled from Cuba became an American on Friday. He was imprisoned by castro for thirty years. He was going to celebrate with a cigar.


I have one thing to say to him:



WELCOME

TO THE

AMERICAN FAMILY

Irshad Manji

As I was watching C-Span this afternoon I was totally enthralled by what Irshad Manji had to say about her faith, Islam. While I know we don't get the full story about Islam from Fox, cnn, el al. But at the same time I have trouble reconciling the monsters that are more than willing to kill themselves to kill us to what she said the Koran says about the dignity it gives women.

What she had imparted from the Koran and stories about where women have earned their own money were able to become literate. When one such woman quoted a verse from the Koran her husband never again raised his hand to her.

She imparted stories about how her book is being accepted in the Muslim world-even if it at this point in the underground. But to be honest at one point the 95 Thesis was the Christian underground too.

Her suggestion about seed loans so women could start their own businesses was a very intriguing idea that should be explored.

I guess there is a part of me that is hoping that there will be some point where we can just have peace, but part of the problem (especially in Israel) it is a blood feud...even if Israel doesn't always take part. No matter what I don't believe they are not going to get peace with Hamas. I also have my doubts about how widespread this dissident muslim movement is, but there again all it took was Martin Luther getting things started to bring Christianity out of the Dark Ages.

I'm not talking about disengagement with the monsters. Evil must be fought no matter what it's shade. But there is something to be said for the hope of peace, especially when the times demand the rifle .

Friday, June 29, 2007

This is the last straw I doubt man-made global warming

When the alleged global warming is being blamed for starting wars, it is time to admit there is more going on than a couple of degree changes in one century by blaming a perceive climate changes making those that would rather kill themselves to kill those that don't agree with them slaughter innocent people. The UN doesn't really like to blame those that are more than willing to kill Christians so it's easier to blame the weather.

Or you start blaming barnyard smells for global warming...if methane is what is contributing to global warming, methane has no odor. So the old adage I was taught in criminal investigations come into play. (Why's this person lying to me?) Rabid animal rights activists that don't like hunting or people eating meat also believe in catastrophic global warming...PETA has an agenda.

Or when scientist are taking temps by air conditioners...where the temp is always warmer.

This whole global warming thing is getting a little beyond bizarre at this point.




Thursday, June 28, 2007

Another reason I'm going to out live you all

Earlier this month I posted that fat people have a better chance of recovering from heart disease.

Reuters is reporting that obese people appear to be less likely to become ill with TB.

For years we have been told that being fat is unhealthy, now there are studies that tell a different story. To be honest, I know it's not really healthy to be fat, but if scientists can't decide what is best as far as health, how can we trust them with the myth of global warming, especially when there is a new article claiming we should worry about global cooling. Science shouldn't be as intangible as it has become. Science traditionally has looked for concrete facts, whether or not it changed once the scientific community adopted the evolution theory I don't know, but there is an established scientific method that isn't being followed any more, and it should worry you as much as Congress worries me about violating our constitutional rights.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Dakotaranger's Personal Message to Congress


political joke of the day

The united nations calling for corrupt free government.

When commie chicks attack


IF messing with the population and the second Amendment weren't enough for the commies

As the closure vote for Amendments for the 'death to the Republican Party' bill was taking place the Senate was also having committee on violence on TV.

As if attacking the free exchange of ideas on talk radio isn't enough, they want to tell networks what they can put on TV. I thought the libs were the champions of the 1st Amendment? While attacks on the First Amendment isn't anything knew for these marxists (taking the Bible out of school) and hearings in the thirties about comic book violence hurting America.

The libs are still throwing a fit over McCarthyism but they turn around and can't handle if people don't accept their world view without calling them a racist or a homophobe and they try to silence the debate.

If the commies limit the violence on TV I'm going to be grumpy if Jack Bauer can't torture the bad guys any more or CSI can't show the weird crimes that the put on the show now. Why should us adults suffer if parents are being responsible to shut off HBO? Just because parents aren't being responsible, doesn't give the government the right to censor what is on TV. If the violence wasn't what the market place wanted it wouldn't be on, the same with talk radio...and I don't care what the traitors trent lott, Mrs. bill clinton, and Senator fienstien think.

The constitution is to keep the government in line, not the populace. While I can understand wanting more power, but these people are violating the oath they swore before God to protect the constitution. I guess this is the kind of government we get when their is no fear of God nor the populace.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Talk Radio, Dissent, Free Speech, and commies

Drudge is reporting that two Mrs. bill clinton and Senator Boxer are conspiring to control talk radio. A couple of years ago when those of who support the President and the idea of going to Iraq (we should have hit Iraq harder and then hit Iran) were hit repeatedly with the statement, 'dissent is the highest form of Patriotism' and we weren't supposed to question their patriotism. But now they are trying to make moves to restrict, not only our constitutional rights but our God-given right to free speech and self-preservation.

To make things worse, there are Republicans that could possibly be traitors and side with the restriction of Free Speech and the free exchange of ideas. That already have said something may have to be done because the American populace is educating itself by not trusting the dan rather ilk. Never mind there were talk show hosts that defended that traitor trent lott when he was under fire.

Free speech has been under fire for a while, but the idea of the 'fairness doctrine' being reintroduced is insane because of a recent study being released that the main stream media members donate 9 to 1 to liberals. Now I don't care about what people do with their money but it is pretty telling that talk radio is balance to the left leaning media.

There is also a bill bouncing around congress that will limit the right of organizations to suggest legal forms of dissent (ie writing letters and phone calls). Another violation of free speech.

A bill that would consider it a crime to even question morality behind homosexuality. So there are pastors that could be arrested and jailed for the practicing the right to religious expression.

Granted there has been other infringements of free speech (mccaine-fiengold campaign finance comes to mind) and I complained about that too. And just because Congress has violated this right and other rights doesn't mean they should be allowed to violate any other.

I have a friend that doesn't care about the 2nd Amendment, which I can understand not caring about firearms, but every time a right is violated we loose freedoms. It is a little disheartening to hear because he works for a state senator in the Midwest and with HR 1022 and S 1237 in Congress threatening this right, when the left won running pro-2nd Amendment Dems there is no basis to do this rather than to steal the rights of the populace.

We are told according to Roe v Wade women have the right to choose. According to the 14th Amendment there is an equal protection law. So I should have the right to choose what vehicle I want to drive. Since I've been in some serious wrecks, hunt, and live in North Dakota I drive a 1/2 ton four-wheel drive pick-up. If the new CAFE standards are passed Congress takes that right away from us.

These things worry me how the elites think they know better, even worse try to control the populace by doing the same thing they accuse the hated conservative of. How did we even get to this point where any of these were even feasible?

S 1237 with Commentary from Dakotaranger

Since I've talked about this bill for a couple of months and the next post will make this one even more important I post the text of the Bill here
Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2007 (Introduced in Senate)
S 1237 IS
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1237
To increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of firearms or the issuance of firearms and explosives licenses to known or suspected dangerous terrorists.

So, we are going to infringe on the rights of citizens because terrorists may get explosives, when there is a bare minimum attempt to secure the borders. We know that there are politicians that want to control every aspect of our lives from what doctor we can see, we know if Mrs. bill clinton becomes President that her husband had no problem raiding a religious sect, and breaking a standing US policy to send a Cuban boy back to castro at gun point. What would stop her from declaring ALL gun owners terrorists? If this were to pass nothing. What makes matters worse is Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who has done nothing to stem the tide of illegal immigration, wants the power to limit who can buy firearms...even though he is totally unelected.


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 26, 2007
Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of firearms or the issuance of firearms and explosives licenses to known or suspected dangerous terrorists.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2007'.
SEC. 2. GRANTING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE AUTHORITY TO DENY THE SALE, DELIVERY, OR TRANSFER OF A FIREARM OR THE ISSUANCE OF A FIREARMS OR EXPLOSIVES LICENSE OR PERMIT TO DANGEROUS TERRORISTS.
(a) Standard for Exercising Attorney General Discretion Regarding Transferring Firearms or Issuing Firearms Permits to Dangerous Terrorists- Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting after section 922 the following:
`Sec. 922A. Attorney General's discretion to deny transfer of a firearm
`The Attorney General may deny the transfer of a firearm under section 922(t)(1)(B)(ii) of this title if the Attorney General--
`(1) determines that the transferee is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism, or providing material support or resources for terrorism; and
`(2) has a reasonable belief that the prospective transferee may use a firearm in connection with terrorism.
`Sec. 922B. Attorney General's discretion regarding applicants for firearm permits which would qualify for the exemption provided under section 922(t)(3)
`The Attorney General may determine that--
`(1) an applicant for a firearm permit which would qualify for an exemption under section 922(t) is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism, or providing material support or resources for terrorism; and
`(2) the Attorney General has a reasonable belief that the applicant may use a firearm in connection with terrorism.';
(2) in section 921(a), by adding at the end the following:
`(36) The term `terrorism' includes international terrorism and domestic terrorism, as those terms are defined in section 2331 of this title.
`(37) The term `material support or resources' has the same meaning as in section 2339A of this title.
`(38) The term `responsible person' means an individual who has the power, directly or indirectly, to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the applicant or licensee pertaining to firearms.'; and
(3) in the table of sections, by inserting after the item relating to section 922 the following:
`922A. Attorney General's discretion to deny transfer of a firearm.
`922B. Attorney General's discretion regarding applicants for firearm permits which would qualify for the exemption provided under section 922(t)(3).'.
(b) Effect of Attorney General Discretionary Denial Through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) on Firearms Permits- Section 922(t) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(B)(ii), by inserting `or State law, or that the Attorney General has determined to deny the transfer of a firearm pursuant to section 922A of this title' before the semicolon;
(2) in paragraph (2), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting `, or if the Attorney General has not determined to deny the transfer of a firearm pursuant to section 922A of this title' after `or State law';
(3) in paragraph (3)--
(A) in subparagraph (A)--
(i) in clause (i)--
(I) in subclause (I), by striking `and' at the end; and
(II) by adding at the end the following:
`(III) was issued after a check of the system established pursuant to paragraph (1);';
(ii) in clause (ii), by inserting `and' after the semicolon; and
(iii) by adding at the end the following:
`(iii) the State issuing the permit agrees to deny the permit application if such other person is the subject of a determination by the Attorney General pursuant to section 922B of this title;';
(4) in paragraph (4), by inserting `, or if the Attorney General has not determined to deny the transfer of a firearm pursuant to section 922A of this title' after `or State law'; and
(5) in paragraph (5), by inserting `, or if the Attorney General has determined to deny the transfer of a firearm pursuant to section 922A of this title' after `or State law'.
(c) Unlawful Sale or Disposition of Firearm Based Upon Attorney General Discretionary Denial- Section 922(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (8), by striking `or' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and inserting `; or'; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
`(10) has been the subject of a determination by the Attorney General under section 922A, 922B, 923(d)(1)(H), or 923(e) of this title.'.
(d) Attorney General Discretionary Denial as Prohibitor- Section 922(g) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (8), by striking `or' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (9), by striking the comma at the end and inserting `; or'; and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
`(10) who has received actual notice of the Attorney General's determination made under section 922A, 922B, 923(d)(1)(H) or 923(e) of this title,'.
(e) Attorney General Discretionary Denial of Federal Firearms Licenses- Section 923(d)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking `Any' and inserting `Except as provided in subparagraph (H), any';
(2) in subparagraph (F), by striking `and' at the end;
(3) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period and inserting `; and'; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
`(H) The Attorney General may deny a license application if the Attorney General determines that the applicant (including any responsible person) is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism, or providing material support or resources for terrorism, and the Attorney General has a reasonable belief that the applicant may use a firearm in connection with terrorism.'.
(f) Discretionary Revocation of Federal Firearms Licenses- Section 923(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting `(1)' after `(e)';
(2) by striking `revoke any license' and inserting the following: `revoke--
`(A) any license';
(3) by striking `. The Attorney General may, after notice and opportunity for hearing, revoke the license' and inserting the following: `;
`(B) the license'; and
(4) by striking `. The Secretary's action' and inserting the following: `; or
`(C) any license issued under this section if the Attorney General determines that the holder of such license (including any responsible person) is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism or providing material support or resources for terrorism, and the Attorney General has a reasonable belief that the applicant may use a firearm in connection with terrorism.
`(2) The Attorney General's action'.
(g) Attorney General's Ability To Withhold Information in Firearms License Denial and Revocation Suit-
(1) IN GENERAL- Section 923(f)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the first sentence the following: `However, if the denial or revocation is pursuant to subsection (d)(1)(H) or (e)(3), any information upon which the Attorney General relied for this determination may be withheld from the petitioner, if the Attorney General determines that disclosure of the information would likely compromise national security.'.
(2) SUMMARIES- Section 923(f)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the third sentence the following: `With respect to any information withheld from the aggrieved party under paragraph (1), the United States may submit, and the court may rely upon, summaries or redacted versions of documents containing information the disclosure of which the Attorney General has determined would likely compromise national security.'.
(h) Attorney General's Ability To Withhold Information in Relief From Disabilities Lawsuits- Section 925(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the third sentence the following: `If the person is subject to a disability under section 922(g)(10) of this title, any information which the Attorney General relied on for this determination may be withheld from the applicant if the Attorney General determines that disclosure of the information would likely compromise national security. In responding to the petition, the United States may submit, and the court may rely upon, summaries or redacted versions of documents containing information the disclosure of which the Attorney General has determined would likely compromise national security.'.
If the fore mentioned scenario happens, the government will have no responsibility to tell you why the denied a purchase...For all we know it could be because you subscribe to a talk shows website, or blog, or practice what the libs called the greatest form of Patriotism-dissent. Which now they want to shut down, but that's the next post.

(i) Penalties- Section 924(k) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking `or' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the comma at the end and inserting `; or'; and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
`(4) constitutes an act of terrorism, or providing material support or resources for terrorism,'.
(j) Remedy for Erroneous Denial of Firearm or Firearm Permit Exemption-
(1) IN GENERAL- Section 925A of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(A) in the section heading, by striking `Remedy for erroneous denial of firearm' and inserting `Remedies';
(B) by striking `Any person denied a firearm pursuant to subsection (s) or (t) of section 922' and inserting the following:
`(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), any person denied a firearm pursuant to subsection (t) of section 922 or a firearm permit pursuant to a determination made under section 922B'; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
`(b) In any case in which the Attorney General has denied the transfer of a firearm to a prospective transferee pursuant to section 922A of this title or has made a determination regarding a firearm permit applicant pursuant to section 922B of this title, an action challenging the determination may be brought against the United States. The petition shall be filed not later than 60 days after the petitioner has received actual notice of the Attorney General's determination under section 922A or 922B of this title. The court shall sustain the Attorney General's determination upon a showing by the United States by a preponderance of evidence that the Attorney General's determination satisfied the requirements of section 922A or 922B, as the case may be. To make this showing, the United States may submit, and the court may rely upon, summaries or redacted versions of documents containing information the disclosure of which the Attorney General has determined would likely compromise national security. Upon request of the petitioner or the court's own motion, the court may review the full, undisclosed documents ex parte and in camera. The court shall determine whether the summaries or redacted versions, as the case may be, are fair and accurate representations of the underlying documents. The court shall not consider the full, undisclosed documents in deciding whether the Attorney General's determination satisfies the requirements of section 922A or 922B.'.
(2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 925A and inserting the following:
`925A. Remedies.'.
(k) Provision of Grounds Underlying Ineligibility Determination by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System- Section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 922 note) is amended--
(1) in subsection (f), by inserting `or the Attorney General has made a determination regarding an applicant for a firearm permit pursuant to section 922B of title 18, United States Code,' after `is ineligible to receive a firearm';
(2) in subsection (f), by inserting `except any information for which the Attorney General has determined that disclosure would likely compromise national security,' after `reasons to the individual,'; and
(3) in subsection (g)--
(A) the first sentence--
(i) by inserting `or if the Attorney General has made a determination pursuant to section 922A or 922B of title 18, United States Code,' after `or State law,'; and
(ii) by inserting `, except any information for which the Attorney General has determined that disclosure would likely compromise national security' before the period at the end ; and
(B) by adding at the end the following: `Any petition for review of information withheld by the Attorney General under this subsection shall be made in accordance with section 925A of title 18, United States Code.'.
(l) Unlawful Distribution of Explosives Based Upon Attorney General Discretionary Denial- Section 842(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (9), by striking the period and inserting `; or'; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
`(10) has received actual notice of the Attorney General's determination made pursuant to subsection (b)(8) or (d)(2) of section 843 of this title.'.
(m) Attorney General Discretionary Denial as Prohibitor- Section 842(i) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (7), by inserting `; or' at the end; and
(2) by inserting after paragraph (7) the following:
`(8) who has received actual notice of the Attorney General's determination made pursuant to subsection (b)(8) or (d)(2) of section 843 of this title,'.
(n) Attorney General Discretionary Denial of Federal Explosives Licenses and Permits- Section 843(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking `Upon' and inserting `Except as provided in paragraph (8), upon'; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
`(8) The Attorney General may deny the issuance of a permit or license to an applicant if the Attorney General determines that the applicant or a responsible person or employee possessor thereof is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation of, in aid of, or related to terrorism, or providing material support or resources for terrorism, and the Attorney General has a reasonable belief that the person may use explosives in connection with terrorism.'.
(o) Attorney General Discretionary Revocation of Federal Explosives Licenses and Permits- Section 843(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting `(1)' after `(d)';
(2) by striking `if in the opinion' and inserting the following: `if--
`(A) in the opinion'; and
(3) by striking `. The Secretary's action' and inserting the following: `; or
`(B) the Attorney General determines that the licensee or holder (or any responsible person or employee possessor thereof) is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism, or providing material support or resources for terrorism, and that the Attorney General has a reasonable belief that the person may use explosives in connection with terrorism.
`(2) The Attorney General's action'.
(p) Attorney General's Ability To Withhold Information in Explosives License and Permit Denial and Revocation Suits- Section 843(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after the first sentence the following: `However, if the denial or revocation is based upon an Attorney General determination under subsection (b)(8) or (d)(2) of section 843 of this title, any information which the Attorney General relied on for this determination may be withheld from the petitioner if the Attorney General determines that disclosure of the information would likely compromise national security.'; and
(2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following: `In responding to any petition for review of a denial or revocation based upon an Attorney General determination under subsection (b)(8) or (d)(2) of section 843, the United States may submit, and the court may rely upon, summaries or redacted versions of documents containing information the disclosure of which the Attorney General has determined would likely compromise national security.'.
(q) Ability To Withhold Information in Communications to Employers- Section 843(h)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting `or in section 843(b)(1) (on grounds of terrorism) of this title' after `section 842(i)'; and
(2) in subparagraph (B)--
(A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting `or in section 843(b)(8),' after `section 842(i),'; and
(B) in clause (ii), by inserting `, except that any information that the Attorney General relied on for a determination pursuant to section 843(b)(8) may be withheld if the Attorney General concludes that disclosure of the information would likely compromise national security' after `determination'.
(r) Conforming Amendment to Immigration and Nationality Act- Section 101(a)(43)(E)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(E)(ii)) is amended by striking `or (5)' and inserting `(5), or (10)'.

When out of staters mess with the rights of another

Kfyr Radio reports
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) _ The nation's largest atheist group is suing North Dakota officials over the Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch.
The Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation says public money is used for services to troubled youth -- and that the Boys and Girls Ranch religiously ``indoctrinates'' youth.
The group wants a judge to declare a violation of the constitutional separation of church and state.
The lawsuit is filed in federal court in Bismarck against Lisa Bjergaard, director of juvenile services for the state Department of Corrections, and Ward County Social Services director Daniel Richter. Bjergaard said she had not seen the lawsuit and declined comment. Richter did not immediately return a telephone call.


No one in North Dakota has ever complained, but some dang Easterners think that a group in North Dakota is wrong for trying to help troubled youth is wrong for introducing faith into the kid's lives... I don't understand why 'atheists' are so afraid of a God that they claim doesn't exist.

It's bad enough that we have to deal with Federal Intrusion on our way of life, but to have a group try to force their views that has NO Constitutional basis irritates me.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Winner of the Biggest, shiniest gun-Sadaam Husaan

Sadaam's Gold Plated Tabuk (Iraqi made AK-47)

"Religion in a Family is at once its
brightest Ornament & itsbest Security."--

Samuel Adams (letter to Thomas Wells, 22 November 1780)Reference: The Writing of Samuel Adams, Harry Alonzo Cushing,ed., vol. 4 (225)

Where were the bullies when George Clooney and Brad Pitt were in School?

Monday after an ill-fated trip to the range I was listening to KFYR radio and they were giving away tickets to Ocean 13. While it was good, it really didn't compare to what the Rat Pack did with the original Ocean's 11. And I'll admit it was pretty entertaining.

The caveat to being able to go to the flick gratis was there was a review form that we were supposed to fill out. My one complaint was that Pitt and Clooney in one scene were crying like little school girls when they were watching Oprah.

What happened to American society that has made it alright for men to cry and to hug each other? Men are supposed to be able to take a beating, to stand up against a wrong, and not be sissy's. It concerns me that there are people that are pushing the thought that toughness is something that should scorned. What's going to happen when the monster's strike and it is clear that we no longer have a choice to sit on the sidelines? Sit down, suck on our thumb, and pout?

Shoot, my grandparents lived through the Great Depression and Grandpa was a medic in WWII. They didn't have the option of sitting down and crying they had to face the difficulty head on.

I don't know if it is because we are becoming such a self-adsorbed culture that men can be sissy's and there is no longer the shame of not cinching up the belt and getting the job done, or whatever else it could be. It just sticks in my craw is all.



Sunday, June 17, 2007


Friday, June 15, 2007

Mississippi needs to have a recall election for trent lott

The New York Times in an article about the illegal alien legalization bill of 2007 has Senator lott complaining about how talk radio is "running the country" and that should be dealt with. So he wants to violate the freedom of the press and one of the guiding principles of the Republic, the right to the free exchange of ideas. I don't care if he and his other Senators do not like the idea that they are getting millions of calls demanding that our sovereignty and our laws be obeyed.

Here's my thought, ANY politician that thinks they have the right to violate any part of the constitution is a traitor and should be tried for treason. I don't care if they say they are going to keep us safe, or they think they know better than us there comes a point that their encroachment on our liberty has gone to far.

So Senator lott, you sir, are a traitor to the oath you swore before God to protect the constitution and the United States.

Between the commies and islamofascists we have enough enemies

The Washington Times is reporting that China is smuggling in late model small arms to insurgents in Iraq via Iran.

China has been a thorn in our side since we sided with mao instead of Chang Ki Sheck. Whether it was sending troops into the Korean Conflict, arming North Viet Nam we are being short sighted if we don't see China as a threat.

With China owning port terminals in California and owning both sides of the Panama Canal and firing lasers at our satellites we are eventually going to have to deal with them.

This is Cooper

My beloved sister has gotten a new kitten. Sounds like he could be a relative because he loves to eat.

Forget about dieting I'm going to out live you all

A new study says there may be an advantage for obese people as far as heart disease goes.

Since scientists can't even make up their minds about this, why don't people question global warming more? Sorry, I forgot public education.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

This is a dictatorship

I unfortunately find the need to republish my posting policy,

If your going to post and have it accepted by me if it is a bizarre theory two things need to be known, some sort of ID I don't care if it is an alias ALSO where your from. This is a dictatorship there is no freedom of speech here.

I WILL NEVER accept anything disparaging the police, Israel, or the military. This is a dictatorship there is no freedom of speech here.

There is no place for profanity on this blog. If anything stronger than Hell or dang it isn't going to be posted. This is a dictatorship there is no freedom of speech here.

I go by the court of law truth, not what someone has heard from someone that may or may not have been there.

If I believe use of a controlled substance has occurred in your attempt to be intelligent, it isn't acceptable. This is a dictatorship there is no freedom of speech hereEnglish is used anything else isn't allowed.

This is a dictatorship there is no freedom of speech.This is a dictatorship.

I may accept your views but it doesn't give anyone the right to be heard on my blogs but me.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007



'Car's aren't dangerous and DUI's aren't that big of deal' say media pundits

I was pretty disgusted the last couple of weeks with the media coverage of paris hilton and that druggiechick that plowed over 35 people in Washington. While I rarely care about what the self-important celebrities do being a default member of MADD I was slightly disgusted at ms. hilton's blatant disregard for the law, but I was incensed at those that were saying the judge was too harsh on her, because it is no big deal and not that many people were sentenced so harshly. What this tells me is the judges and the legislature need to get tougher.

Then there is the druggiechick in Washington DC that ran down 35 people. One of the articles I saw was complaining that she was charged with being armed with a car.

About a month before my dad was murdered by LES LEMM our town lost Officer Keith Braddock was shot by robert mead jr when he responded to a shots fired call at a bar in town. Both just as dead, one was killed with the use of a car and one was with a firearm. Unfortunately, because there is this irrational fear of a firearm the sentence is worse than if people are slaughtered with cars.

The reason it bugs me so much is simple: those that say a DUI isn't that big of deal fight tooth and nail to take law abiding citizens from being able to protect themselves from criminals. I guess it is safe to assume those that don't fear the incorrect use of vehicles must climb behind the wheel hammered and selfish. If ms. hilton changes her ways great, but to treat drunk driving so caviler when there are so many different warnings about the dangers on the television and radio is not only hypocritical but is incredibly selfish not to care about your fellow man.

Saturday, June 09, 2007

Friday, June 08, 2007

With a Heavy Heart.

As I have admitted many times I'm not really a pet person, but when it comes to Katie she has a way of "worming herself" into your heart. Which she didn't convert other non-pet or cat-haters to cat-lovers beyond her. (PS she didn't belong in shopping malls either)

But as I wrote back in April she is a member of the family and we know she felt the loss of dad just as much as we did, just judging how she would go over to the church at the times dad would be ready for a break for months afterwards.
Needless to say she was a great comfort to us three in the years afterwards.

But in the last couple of months her health has begun to deteriate and her organs are begining to fail her. So tomorrow my beloved sister is going to do one of the hardest things, something none of us want but we don't want Katie to suffer any more.

She will be missed.


Thursday, June 07, 2007

Senator Tancrado

As I was watching a rerun of yesterday's Your World with Neil Cavioto I saw an interview with the Senator that has caused me to loose any respect and any potential support I may have thrown behind him.

He repeated a comment that basically says the next attack on the US the blood will be on the President's hand. Well, over the years I haven't withheld the things I disagree with the President from the prescription drug benefit boondoggle to his border policy (and the Administrations support of S1237 which gives the Attorney General veto power on the purchase of firearms, a clear violation of the Second Amendment and what the Founders intended and does nothing to keep assault weapons out of the hands of terrorists because we aren't sealing the borders). And I still think we should have hit Iraq harder and when we realized Iran was in Iraq hit Iran...but for whatever reason we got scared when the Abu Grahib pics surfaced.

In spite of these things I still support the President and I don't enjoy hearing other conservatives cutting down someone that has done almost everything to keep the monsters at bay (I'll grant the Senator the fact we need to seal the borders). Part of the reason it bugs me is that it sounds like he's being a media ----- by following the same track as the media for the last eight years. It may be a valid point but the Senator says nothing about joe stalin in drag with her comments last week? Doesn't go after Senator edwards?

There are some good things that the President has done from the economy to the taxes and we have for the most part have kept the monsters at bay.

If the Senator was a conservative as he claims he would stick to Reagan's Golden rule, or at least realize that the President isn't running this go around. I'm sticking with my original assesment of the current field-YUCK!

My outrage button is broken, and I'm fine with it.

Over the last couple of years congress and the sports media has been all bound up at the "shock, the shock that steroids were being used." In all honesty I just don't care if some guy is using steroids in baseball. I just want to watch a game and go on with my life.

What really bugs me about the whole thing is the false indignation coming from sports writers from which if they were to have a blood sample taken one of three things would be found out. 1. No heart. 2. No brain activity. 3. Some controlled drug in their system.

With all this indignation that is thrust upon us from the media, "the moderators of decency," and the pulpit. I have none left for something that wasn't considered a crime when Jason Giambi was supposedly taking steroids.

I stand by my original proposition when someone is alleged to have committed a crime, if they are guilty convict them, until then I just don't care.

The only good thing that could come from this is congress wastes time on something that isn't under there jurisdiction. It keeps the rest of our freedoms safe from those idiots.

While I understand that smut sells, but when it comes from hypocrits that don't even live up to the standards they set for others....SHUT UP!!!

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

A thief stuck a pistol in a man's ribs and said,
"Give me your money."
The gentleman, shocked by the sudden
attack, said "You cannot do this,
I'm a United States Congressman!"
The thief said, "In that case, give me my money!"

Friday, June 01, 2007


"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God."
~Thomas Jefferson

Another reason to seal the borders

This TB "sufferer" may not be a terrorist but if he was on a no-fly list because he was a threat to other people and if the Border Patrol wouldn't hold this sleazeball we are in trouble as a nation. The Amnesty Bill will make things only worse. This only adds to the argument that we must seal the border, limiting who enters this nation for the safety of this nation.

Joe Stalin in Drag

This article says it all... I don't even need to comment on how much comrade mrs. bill clinton needs to be defeated.






Up with the Bourgeoisie, down with the


Proletariat and their commie


pupet masters!!!